Jennifer writes to the Minister.

Many Australians go along with the catastrophic climate change myth because they find it hard to believe the sheer scale of the bureaucratic and scientific corruption necessary to maintain it. If you are one of them read this.

Jennifer Marohasy is a research scientist specialising in weed control and environmental management. The need for accurate meteorological data in her work has led her to question the current practice of “adjusting” historical Australian meteorological records. She recently wrote about this to the new Parliamentary Secretary for the Minister to the Environment, Mr Bob Baldwin MP.

Her letter concludes:

In conclusion, while the Bureau professes to use world’s best practice in the construction of temperatures series that ostensibly show run-away global warming, the techniques employed could perhaps be better described as designed to exclude the hot years of the Federation drought, negate the cooling evident across much of the continent from 1910 to 1950, and exaggerate recent warming from at least 1970 to 2000. That many senior managers at the Bureau have built their careers on the notion that temperatures will continue to increase, and are recorded in the Climategate emails as believing in the need to continually reinforce to the public that temperatures will continue to increase irrespective of the evidence, means the committee has a mighty job restoring some integrity to the official national temperature record. Indeed, I believe this will only be possible when there is cultural change at the Bureau, and within the climate science community more generally. I nevertheless wish you, and the new panel all the best in this most important endeavour.

The full text can be downloaded here.

Note that this “world’s best practice” in massaging records is precisely the same as that used by NASA in bringing us the “record hot year” of 2014.

2 thoughts on “Jennifer writes to the Minister.”

  1. The “sheer scale” is here alright, not least in the Mainstream Media (MSM), especially the ABC where weather as “climate change” is often a news item. On SBS TV last night we had the quasi-“science” set to operatic music and narration of TheTipping Points on NITV (34) at 7-30 pm, and Years of Living Dangerously on SBS1 at 9-30 pm.

  2. I have no personal qualifications or expertise to judge the correctness or otherwise of these apparently plausible views.
    Why are they not universally accepted if patently correct?
    I would be very pleased to see a peer review of them and/or comment on them by NASA.

Comments are closed.